I Agree with Bill Richardson

Bill Richardson endorsed Barack Obama for President this week.  In his endorsement he called Obama’s speech on race an historic speech (click attached link to view the speech).  I wholeheartedly agree.  Listening to the speech, I felt the way I have felt listening to Martin Luther King’s speeches or reading Lincoln’s speeches.  Obama turned an apology for Reverend Wright’s intolerant remarks into an uplifting appeal to our better angels.  His eloquence and power to move us are truly unique. 


From a political standpoint as well, it was brilliant.  He confronted the Wright comments head on and managed to turn a weakness into a strength. As Richardson pointed out, Obama, ahead in the delegate count, could have been more cautious and waited for it all to blow over.  He was brave, confident, poised.


Barack Obama gives voice to our frustrations as well as to our desire to love and do good in the world.  It is emotionally satisfying to listen to him.  True, his speeches contain plenty of politics; this one reverted to the tested applause lines of bashing corporations, the special interests, the Iraq War, and above all, Bush.  But none of that diminishes the energy of his walking us through how blacks in America feel, how whites in America feel, how we should understand the bitterness and misunderstanding on both sides.  Nor does it diminish the power of his own story, of his having white grandparents who at once loved him completely and harbored some parochial and perhaps bigoted views about blacks.  Very imperfectly human.

He did a pretty good job explaining Reverend Wright, his anger about racism against blacks, his imperfect humanness, at once helping the downtrodden and harboring bigoted views.  While he sharply criticized Wright’s wrong views, he sought to diminish the impact by explaining why he holds them.  It is what conservatives typically hate about liberals, their tendency to want to explain deviant behavior – be it crime, Islamic terrorism, or bigotry among minorities – rather than to simply categorically condemn it. 

Yet this speech contained one of the most eloquent explanations of human contradiction I have ever heard.  Our simultaneous failings and potential.  The capacity to love and hate, build and destroy.  Obama exhorted us to aspire to the best that is in us.  He gave a profound speech, painting a very human picture, right in the middle of one of the most competitive presidential elections in our history.  Brave, confident, poised.   

Obama’s very candidacy asks us to move beyond our divisions, to come together to solve problems.  It is a compelling message.  What I call my “aspirational politics” are fully behind the candidacy of Barack Obama.  I aspire to live in a world wrought by Barack Obama, like the world created by the writers of The West Wing. Yet my actual politics are more cautious, more realistic, or some might say, more cynical.

A president must also help identify answers, solutions.  He/she is an executive, so he/she must guide an enormous bureaucracy, set priorities, lead.  Speeches are important.  Without them, you are a failed president.  But speeches aren’t enough.

In his speech, Obama exhorted blacks to identify their economic challenges with those of the wider nation.  He exhorted whites to try to understand the injustices faced by minorities.  But, his only allusions to solutions were “cut and paste” from the stump – stop corporations from shipping jobs overseas, give everyone health care paid for by the government, stop the Iraq War, stop the lobbyists and special interests. 


His speech was uplifting, but also pessimistic.  It was pessimistic in that it looked at what is wrong with America.  Ronald Reagan told us it was “morning in America.”  You could not shake Reagan’s unshakeable belief that there was nothing wrong with America.  I’m not saying there is nothing wrong with America.  I’m just saying that perhaps Obama believes there is more wrong with America than there actually is. 


He explains that America is great, because only in America could someone with his story have the opportunity to become president.  But he only partially understands why this is so.  In his speech, he correctly alluded to the Constitution and the fact that America’s flawed institutions from the founding of the Republic contained the seeds of change, the promise of equality for all Americans.   This was a very moving part of his speech for me, because it was the source of Lincoln’s greatness. 

Lincoln understood that America’s democratic institutions were robust and could withstand a Civil War that ended slavery.  These institutions could be updated and perfected to include more people and give voice to their aspirations, avoiding the bloody revolutions occurring throughout the world and throughout history.

But what Barack Obama may not fully understand is that in addition to inclusion, people desire an improving standard of living and economic security. 

For most of the people of the world, excluding the exceptionally good among us, our better angels only come out when we have jobs.  It is our liberal, capitalist economy that ensures social peace.  It is globalization, international trade, a well-run fiscal policy, a well-run monetary policy, prudent regulation of banks and other institutions, adequate taxes to fund education, a police force, the armed forces and a social safety net, but not prohibitive taxes that discourage entrepreneurship – in short, it is our flexible, dynamic economy that keeps America’s standard of living high, including that of blacks and other minorities.  And this keeps racial tensions to a minimum, emotions from boiling over, bloody revolutions from happening.  Recognition of another person’s pain a la Obama is important, but a sound economy is more important.

We’re not sure how Obama would act on economic policy, but his campaign and track record lean left. Bill Clinton and his Treasury Secretary Bob Rubin were centrists.  They made fiscal policy fairer than it was under Reagan, but they let markets function relatively unfettered; they passed NAFTA and brought China into the global trading system.  Market economics was the core belief of the centrist Democratic Leadership Council, which Bill Clinton co-founded, and the New Democrat Network.  It seems to me that this winning agenda, which by the way was the successful agenda of New Labour in Britain under Tony Blair, may to an extent escape Barack Obama. 

At this point in history, what do we need more, racial healing or a sound management of economic and foreign policies?  From this point of view, it was a little odd that, during the week that Bear Stearns almost failed, Barack Obama gave a speech on race.


Richardson alluded to the fact that Barack Obama opened up, calmly and with decency, about how people feel about race in this country.  So, in the spirit of understanding, allow me to open up a little on a personal level: how one Jewish-American feels about this speech, from a Jewish perspective. 


Reverend Wright called Zionism a form of white racism.  Barack Obama criticized this statement, saying, and I paraphrase, that to blame the ills in the Middle East completely on the actions of an ally (Israel) and not on radical Islam, is unfair.  

I basked in that line.  I swam in it.  I danced among its words and letters.  Thank you, Barack. You made me feel great. 

I’m not being facetious.  I really did love that line and was so happy he said it.  But, again from my personal Jewish perspective, I felt he could have said more. 

He didn’t go into why Wright was wrong about Zionism.  He didn’t discuss Jesse Jackson’s Hymie-town remark or Louis Farrakhan.  He didn’t discuss the Jewish frustration that black nationalism, Million-Man-March-pull-yourself-up-by-the-bootstraps activism sometimes contains anti-Semitism.  He didn’t explain, why, why Reverend Wright in speaking out about white oppression of blacks in this country felt a need to take a swipe at the Jews.  Is it the competition of the oppressed for the mantle of persecution?

He didn’t discuss the parallels between the simultaneous good works of Wright’s church and his racist oratory on the one hand, and Hamas, with its simultaneous social welfare programs and genocidal Jew-hatred on the other. 

He exhorted white Americans, tired of hearing about the plight of black Americans, to try to understand black bitterness. But he didn’t exhort non-Jews in America, tired of hearing about anti-Semitism and Israel, to understand the sensitivity of Jews to these issues, given the Holocaust and the history of anti-Semitism, even in America.   He didn’t criticize Walt and Mearsheimer, two prominent American political scientists, for resuscitating the golem of Jewish control of the government.  But after all, it was a speech on race, not on anti-Semitism.

So, Bill Richardson was impressed by how far Barack Obama went in his speech, but one Jewish-American felt he didn’t go far enough.


Obama didn’t speak about how Reverend Wright may be misinformed about Zionism and that someone should simply explain to him that Zionism is Civil Rights. 


Zionism is Civil Rights.


It is the quintessence of Civil Rights.  A homeland in Palestine for the Jews, a globally persecuted minority for thousands of years, is Civil Rights.  Giving Jews the civil rights to live peaceably in their own country after one third of them were murdered as the world looked on.  A country they have lived in since time immemorial (my relatives have been in Jerusalem for five centuries).  Sure, the Palestinian problem is complex.  Arafat and the Husseinis who led them wouldn’t accept partition.  Sure, Israel hasn’t always treated the Palestinians well. Some people view some settlements as a barrier to peace. But let me say it again: Zionism is Civil Rights. 


Pro-Israel friends of Barack Obama should encourage him to say this. Such a statement coming from Barack Obama would show me, a Jew, concerned about his pastor and his association with Brzezinski and others, that he really means it when he says he wants to bridge rifts, heal wounds, recognize injustice, bring people together.  It would go far to healing black-Jewish tensions.  And, it is a true statement.  Zionism is not racism.  Zionism is Civil Rights. This is my inner angry Jew speaking to Barack Obama’s inner angry black man.  Just say the words.  Just say it.

And now to all the Bush bashing.  I’m tired of it.  Obama says he wants to stop the old politics, the politics of personal destruction, yet he trashes W at every turn.  When Bill Richardson, during his endorsement, blamed everything from the recession to global warming to the extinction of the dinosaurs on George W. Bush, Obama smiled, clapped and bellowed, “Yeah!”  If we’re trying to understand the other, aspire to our better angels, liberals should try to understand Republicans, instead of demonizing them.

Finally, as in all of his speeches, Barack Obama suggests that the way forward to this nirvana of racial peace and jobs and good schools is through his candidacy. If we don’t join his movement, as he said in his speech, we’ll go back to politics as usual.  This smacks a little of hubris, that he believes he represents perhaps the only way forward.

In short, it was a powerful, moving speech.  I came a step closer to pulling the lever for Obama.  The speech sought to explain human nature, our failings, our strengths.  It sought to explain how the different races feel about each other, and it called on us to understand our fellow humans.  It appealed to our better nature. It was rooted in who Barack Obama is.  Truly extraordinary. 

Yet Obama remains short on practical solutions, short on understanding how the global economy has made us successful, has underpinned our aspirations and our social peace. And, for all his efforts to give voice to the frustration of different ethnic groups in order to engender understanding, I, as a Jew, felt he could have said more. True, he failed to mention the plight of many other ethnic groups.  Yet my inner angry Jew still cries, Zionism is Civil Rights.  Repeat after me.  Tell Reverend Wright.          



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: