Interesting article on Hamas election victory in January 2006…

From January 2006:

Points that are food for thought include: 1) the notion that with Hamas in power, UN Res. 242 (land for peace) is dead, and the conflict is no longer Israel vs Palestine, how do we split the land, but Arab vs. Jew, Muslim vs. the West; and 2) the series of mistakes made by Israeli leaders includes not doing a deal with Jordan and Egypt in the 70s, negotiating at Oslo with the PLO instead of with local leaders, building settlements, and finally, giving into Condy Rice and allowing Hamas to be elected.  Finally, this all will play into the hands of Netanyahu, whose personality may not make him fit to be Israel’s PM.  Interesting ideas if nothing else. 

From January 2008:

The recent revelation that Condy Rice was “surprised” by the Hamas victory suggests that we in the US cannot afford having gullible neophytes run our foreign policy anymore.  All the more reason to get a new “Kissinger” at the State Department.  Hopefully, if Hillary is elected she won’t put Holbrooke there, who has as much strategic depth as Madeleine Albright.  Unfortunately, not a deep bench for foreign policy on the Democratic side.  Got me worried.  People talk about Biden whose got the IQ of a talk show host…

Analysis: Hamas victory one of most important events in Middle East since Six Day War

By Amir Oren, Haaretz Correspondent
Hamas’ victory in the Palestinian elections is one of the most important events in the history of the Middle East since the Six Day War. Not only does it change the picture, but also it puts it into a completely different frame. Palestine under Hamas rule puts an end not only to the road map and the Oslo process, but also to the formula embodied by UN Resolution 242: “land for peace” and an accompanying end to the conflict. Not only does it perpetuate the conflict, but also it reshapes it – from an Israeli-Palestinian conflict to a Jewish-Arab one, and even a Western-Muslim one. Such a conflict, backed by the global Jihad movement and Khomeinist Iran, has neither a solution nor an end. Hamas received the territories due to the generosity of Israel, which was its custodian until it transferred them to another trustee, the Fatah-based PLO.


Israel took the West Bank from Jordan and the Gaza Strip from Egypt and gave them to Yasser Arafat, who abused his trust and bequeathed his legacy to Hamas. The secularists did not moderate the religious, and now Fatah is liable to resume terror attacks in order to compete with Hamas in belligerence. Israel’s existential struggle until 1967 stemmed from the proximity of its population centers to Arab armies, with their air forces and tank corps. But the Six Day War resulted in Israel’s occupation of Gaza, the West Bank and East Jerusalem. From this position of strength, Israel made three fateful mistakes: Yitzhak Rabin’s first government gave up the chance to return the West Bank to Jordan’s King Hussein; succeeding governments embittered Hussein’s life until he disengaged from the West Bank; and the second Rabin government decided to talk with the Palestinians, not with local leaders, who could have reached a realistic compromise. Instead, he engaged Arafat and his Tunis crowd in the Oslo process, which collapsed like a house of cards under the illusion of a Palestinian government that would be free of both terror and corruption.

And gradually, all the governments forgot the original reason for retaining the territories until peace was achieved as a buffer zone against an invasion and began seeding them with settlements.

Ariel Sharon and his deputy, Ehud Olmert, gave into American pressure and
allowed Hamas to be elected. Condoleezza Rice’s threats against Hamas now are barren and risible: If she indeed absolves Israel of the promise she wrested from it of increasing Palestinian freedom of movement, the Palestinians will suffer for a while, but only until the Americans get used to the new situation. And what Hamas ceases to get from other states it will obtain from Iranian oil revenues and Saudi protection money.

Rabin brought Arafat. Arafat brought Benjamin Netanyahu and Sharon to power. Sharon brought Hamas. And Hamas will yet bring back Netanyahu – and the lion shall lie down with the lamb.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: